COIN NEWSLETTER - August 2004 

 

 


400 infant BIRTHDAY!!

 

Congratulations to everyone for their hard work in the COIN trial. We have on the 24th of July, recruited our 400th eligible infant! To celebrate this milestone, I have packed some goodies for all to share.

 

Retrospective Data

We thank all centres for completing the retrospective data.

 

Centres who have not completed the retrospective data, please forward your data to the coordinating centre as soon as possible.

 

Randomisation

A couple of infants have recently been randomised with the randomisation envelope opened before delivery. We remind all centers that randomisation envelopes are only to be opened in the delivery room and only if the baby is eligible at 5 minutes.

 

Questions regarding COIN case report forms

1.             B1a.  “We have a number of Hispanic patients, but they are not of European origin”, do you want them coded as “other”? Answer: Yes please

 

2.             B2 and B3.  “If a mom is treated with MgSO4 to suppress labor, do you want both “tocolytic drugs” and “Magnesium sulphate” coded as “yes”, or is the magnesium sulphate category only for treatment to prevent seizures?”  Answer: If magnesium sulphate was given, tick the magnesium sulfate box. If it was primarily given for tocolysis, tick the tocolytic box as well. If it was given to treat toxaemia, do not tick the toxcolytic box.

 

3              C8.  “If a baby receives just oxygen in the delivery room without bag/mask, do you want resuscitation coded as “none”?  An example.  If the baby received blow-by oxygen and then was placed on the neopuff for the study, do we code “resuscitation” as “none” and “resuscitation device” as “neopuff”?” Answer: A bit complicated. If the baby is breathing easily and just given oxygen to help it pick up but with no inflations or CPAP that would be coded none. However, if the Neopuff was used to give any inflations then that would be coded “bag and mask” and the device “Neopuff”

 

4.             C8a.  “Do you want any type of self-inflating bag coded as an “anaesthetic” bag or do you want it coded as a “Laerdal” bag, though it is not that brand, but similar in use?  A little more detail on this would be helpful.” Answer: A self inflating bag is one that opens itself after you have squeezed it even if there is no oxygen flowing into it. An anaesthetic bag is one that is soft and does not reinflate after compression unless it has gas flowing in at several L/min and the face mask is on the baby without too much leak. If you are using a self inflating bag please code under Laerdal or Ambu.

 

5.             “For Base Excess, do you want the negative sign written in or just the whole number.  Also, if the value is 0 or a positive number, do you want NA written or just left blank?” Answer: Please enter with a negative sign to prevent confusion. If 0 that is important and not missing so please put whatever number is on the blood gas form.

 

6.             “Does “IA” refer to indwelling arterial line or something else?  We do not recognize this.  Also, we use percutaneous central venous catheters (PSC or PICC), are you not interested in these lines?” Answer:  Sorry, so many confusions in our form. IA is Intra-arterial (radial etc), UA mean umbilical artery. UV means umbilical vein.

 

7              F1.  “Please give us a more detailed description of these different types of CPAP.  Do you want any brand of two prong coded as “Hudson” or just that particular brand?  Also, we are not sure what you mean by “combination” or what would fall into the “other” category.  Also, is this question referring to what type of CPAP the baby was placed on when he/she was admitted to the NICU, or what was used in the delivery room?” Answer: Firstly, in this trial we are keen that people use short binasal prongs. It started out as Hudson prongs. However, any short binasal prongs are acceptable. If you use short binasal other than Hudson’s please put the name in the 5 = other. A combination means where a baby starts on single prong immediately at delivery and then soon changes to short binasal.

 

8.             G2 and G3.  “We had a baby who was intubated in the DR, extubated to CPAP and then cannula all within the first 24 hours of life.  Do we code  “1” day of ET and “1” day of CPAP?  If we do that, it will appear that the baby was on assisted ventilation for 2 days when, in fact, he was not.  Should we be using a hierarchy and only record the highest level of support for any one day?” Answer: Sorry about this confusion. In this randomised trail we are not interested in fractions of a day. Please code ETT as 1 day and CPAP as 1 day and total days as 1 day! It would help if you wrote next to it what had happened.

 

9.             H6.  “Are you specifically looking for when the baby was at 150cc/k/day or when the infant reached full feeding without IV fluids?  We have infants who have their IV’s discontinued prior to receiving 150cc/k of enteral feeds.” Answer: I agree we sometimes have the IV down before 150 cc/kg/day. However, for the purpose of this trial Full Feeds is 150 ml/kg/day and then sustained for at least 3 days. So please wait until it reaches that level.

 

Calculating Age - CRF

In this trial we count the time of birth as day 0 and 0 hours. At 12 hours they are 0.5 days old. At 36 hours they are 1.5 days old.

You need to look at the time and date of birth and work out when they are 28 days using this technique. The day of birth is day 0.

 

Non Randomised infant forms

To make sure there is no misunderstanding, please fill in a non-randomised infant form for every baby who is born at 25 to 28 weeks gestation and does not get enrolled into the COIN trial.

 

Data Monitoring Committee

The data monitoring committee will be assessing 300 infants randomised to the COIN Trial. This process will allow any untoward events to be recognized by an independent data monitoring committee, experienced in perinatal clinical trials.  They will be asked to assess whether either group has excessive rates of mortality, brain haemorrhages, air leaks or other complications.

 

Interested Parties

Centres applying for Research and Ethics Approval

·         Ponthenkandath Sasidharan, Medical College of Wisconsin/Childrens' Hospital of Wisconsin, USA

·         William Tarnow-Mordi (Williamt@westgate.wh.usyd.edu.au) and David Todd (dotie@hotmail.com) Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Centres considering joining the COIN Trial

o        Meera Lama, Queen's Park Hospital, Blackburn, Lancashire. UK

o        Brian Darlow, Christchurch, NZ brian.darlow@chmeds.ac.nz

o        Henry Halliday, Belfast, UK. H.halliday@qub.ac.uk

o        Bruce Schulman, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, USA, BruceSMD@aol.com

o        Anas Olabi, consultant paediatrician, uk, Anas.Olabi@fgh.mbht.nhs.uk

o        Edna Maria de Albuquerque Diniz, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil, ednamad@icr.hcnet.usp.br

o        James Tooley, St Michael's Hospital, UK, James.Tooley@bristol.ac.uk

o        Manuel Durand, University of Southern California, mdurand@email.usc.edu

o        Rodolfo Eduardo Maldonado, Hospital San Roque Gonnet, Buenos Aires romaldovir@ciudad.com.ar

 

 

< 2004

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Total*^

(0) Royal Women’s Hospital, VIC, AUS

132

3

2

3

3

0

2

1

0

146

(1) Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, AUS

26

0

0

5

1

0

0

0

0

32

(2) The Royal Women's Hospital, QLD, AUS

29

0

0

0

0

0

3

1

0

33

(3) Montefiore Medical Centre, New York, USA

18

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

21

(4) The National Women's, Auckland, NZ

14

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

(6) PMH& KEMH, WA, AUS

25

1

1

1

0

2

1

0

0

31

(7) Mc Master University, Canada

12

0

0

1

0

4

 

0

0

17

(8) Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece

25

3

1

3

2

0

0

0

0

34

(9) Jacobi Medical Center, North Central Bronx Hospital, USA

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

(11) Hackensack University Medical Center, NY, USA

6

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

(12) Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

7

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

9

(13) Maternite Regionale Universitaire, Nancy, France

14

1

2

3

0

2

1

3

0

26

(14) Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

(15) Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

(16) Klinik For Neonatologie Charite Berlin, Germany

0

0

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

4

(17) The John Radcliffe, Oxford, UK

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(18) St Helier Hospital, Charshalton, UK

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(19) Golisano Children’s Hospital at Strong, USA

0

0

5

1

0

1

1

0

1

9

(20) B.C. Children’s Hospital, Canada

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(21) Miller Children’s Hospital, USA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(22) Univ. Hospital Antwerp, Belgium

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(23) Universitätsklinikums Freiburg, Germany

0

0

0

0

1

2

0

0

0

3

Total

317

15

13

20

10

11

9

5

1

401

Recruitments to date – 199 babies to go!!!

* Please note some centres have only been recruiting for a few months.

^ Recruitment by baby’s date of birth, eligible babies only.

 

Completion and Return of CRF

 

 

Infants to be Followed up in Year 2004

 

* Excluding infants died.

^ Follow-ups received by the coordinating centre.